Grounding in the code
the agent reads and searches the relevant code before its first edit.
One bug-fixing method across every AI tool. Fewer bounced PRs and repeat review comments. You can see who has the playbook, which agents are on the current policy, and whether rework is going down.
Your team uses Claude Code, Codex and Cursor, and everyone uses them differently. A few engineers' agent PRs almost never bounce. Everyone else's come back for the same misses, and your standards live in one person's config file.
When a reviewer corrects it, she turns the comment into a rule her agent follows from then on.
Engineering managers and tech leads who own review standards, agent policy and AI spend.
Study the code around the bug before editing.
Write a failing test, then make a small, scoped fix.
Read the failure and fix its cause.
Include the failing-then-passing test with the PR.
Illustrative signals. Availability varies by connected agent and workflow.
the agent reads and searches the relevant code before its first edit.
a failing test is written before any source file changes.
tests run after the final change, not before it.
the change stays within the files the task needs.
failures are diagnosed and fixed, not blindly re-run.
the same comment never has to be made twice.
accepted work, not reworked or reverted later.
Every connected agent receives it and acknowledges the current policy version.
Adoption, output and time-saving figures are targets, not measured customer results.
Most teams start with a handful of people who've cracked AI. Halofy gets nearly everyone working their way.
on playbook workflows.
for every engineer who adopts the playbook.
One approved playbook. Every connected agent on the team.